A Positive Approach to the Future

A Positive draw close Towards the Future The go forth of mandatory take reproducibles has taken on several debates oer the past decade it is believed that this issue testament plague normal teachs for decades to come. Students who gain uniforms looking at a mother wit of being lord with their fellow classmates. This ruleing of being set ab pop out of a group boosts morale and several(prenominal) confidence, thus leading to high grades. Children pull up stakes be more than than focused in a uniform trainroom. There is no more distraction as to what the a nonher(prenominal) kids atomic number 18 wearing or who has the abduce brand shoes.Girls ordain be attired appropriately and clothing go away get properly. This adds to the learning experience. There is no more competition. There is no more aspiration and the peasantren atomic number 18 fitting to focus on their develop mould and non on the a la mode(p) trends ( Bodine 67-69). Former President Clinto n made a state of the union address in 1996 in that address, the subject of mandatory educate uniforms was mentioned. If it means that teenagers leave behind stop cleanup each other over fashion designer jackets, then our public schooltimes should be adapted to require their students to wear uniforms (Williams).In point, that form in Long Beach, California, the first territory to implement mandatory uniform policies, spoil dropped by sixty-seven percent, vandalism by eighty-deuce percent, and robbery by 35 percent. Over all(prenominal) crime was reduced by seventy-three percent the first twelvemonth the policy was in place (Williams). This was a direct reflection of the uniform policy. Students were more disciplined and behaved in a more mature manner. These students took pride in themselves and others.With the deficiency of material items to fight over, students no age unyielding felt the need to use intrusion towards others, proving that school uniforms do in fact im prove student behavior. Also when it comes to crime, a student wearing a school logo, is less apt to commit a crime outside of school maculation in uniform because it would be easier to chase after him based get rid of of the school instruction on the uniform? This scorns the crime station for the general public as rise up as the in school instances.not totally do mandatory uniform policies for public schools offer the potential for higher educational benefits and improved student discipline, school uniforms dissolve social boundaries between classmates. Students be no long-range judged based off their appearance but by who they atomic number 18 on the inside. There is no more competition between social classes that these students whitethorn have otherwise felt and they work together as a aggroup and sh ar a common pride. either students leave feel a sense of belonging. No longer will lower income children be labeled as unforesightful based off of their clothing.All children will appear as equals in the classroom and will be treated as such. However, some may argue that consistency takes outside(a) from the students individuality. Many children, especially teens, distill themselves through with(predicate) their personal styles and the way they dress. sometimes children need to feel special or unique and dressing a true way is how they accomplish this. Uniformity takes outside(p) from the First Amendment by taking away license of expression. If we take away the cededom of expression, we are taking away our childrens creativity and conforming them into a society where free thinking is not accepted.However this is not the case. The uniform does not change who the child is on the inside or how he thinks yeastyly. Students will still be able to focus creative energy through activities such as art, music, writing or sports. There are several creative outlets besides the choice of clothing options. When it comes to our economy, we as America ns must pinch our pennies where we can. Many parents are faced with the dilemma of outfitting their children in the a la mode(p) trends or putting coin towards more important things like sparing for their childrens college education.Some families are unable to knuckle under the popular named brand clothing that their children desires, which pose the children, feel inadequate in school when they are constrained to wear lesser brand attire or instant hand outfits. enlighten uniforms would take away that hassle of finding bargains to ensure that their children feel confident in their attire. Uniforms are broadly more durable than the average bridle-path clothes. Granted, the follow may be a bit more substantial in the beginning, but the uniforms will last longer which means there is less out of pocket expense for replacement articles.With uniforms, the parents may only have to purchase two or three sets compared to several pairs of bottoms and tops. Uniforms are more durable and can be washed more frequently compared to lawful clothes. This makes them the better option not only for lower income families, but all families in general (Romero C4+). Critics claim that uniforms will bell the families more coin in the long run because parents will be forced to debauch the uniforms and timed clothing for their children to wear when they are not in school.The cost for parents may double that of just buying traditional school clothes. Although this is partly true, that yes, parents will be faced to make extra purchases for their children, in reality, they really wont be consumption that much more money if any. Since uniforms are more durable, the parents only need to buy a limited supply and since the children will only be wearing their regular clothes outside of school, parents will not have to buy as some(prenominal) outfits. Most children wear out their clothes while in school.Since this is not an issue with the uniforms, the traditional street clothe s will last longer, hence saving the parents money in the long run. Also without the invariant competition in schools, children may not feel the need to have the latest brands and styles as they would if they were wearing the clothes to school on a daily priming coat around other social classes (King 3-5). With all of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing mandatory uniform wear into our public schools, there needs to be a compromise. Some schools have decided that it is outmatch to make minor changes to the dress calculate policy.When it comes to school uniforms, there is a deathless debate as to what the right come on and the wrong approach may be for our public schools. Works Cited Bodine,A.. a? enlighten uniforms, academic achievement, and uses of researcha?. The Journal ofEducational Research 19 Feb. 2008 67-73. Print. King, K. A. Should school uniforms be mandated in basal school?. 2010 3+. Print. Romero, E. a? School uniform countdowna?. Daily News Record, 1 6 Aug. 1999, C2+. Print. Williams, D. a? School uniforms The raging debatea?. n. d. Web. 5 Aug. 2011.